After Britain abolished slavery in 1833, the government agreed to compensate enslavers for the loss of their “property.” Roughly 4,000 awards were made to slave owners across the British colonies, totalling £20 million, equal to about $30.5 billion Canadian, today. The usual understanding has been that Canada was not included in the British government’s compensation package, however recent data from the University of Central London (UCL) suggests that this is not quite true.
While searching through the UCL’s digitized registries of who received compensation and how it was divided, I found out that since 1837, 81 claims were received from persons who resided in Canada and 28 awards were given. While those who owned enslaved persons in Canada were not compensated, those who owned enslaved persons outside of Canada were. In total, they received compensation for 3,790 enslaved persons, totalling £150,333 – about $43 million in current Canadian dollars.
Such a vast injection would have had a significant impact on the economy. And notably, individuals listed in the database include former provincial governor Sir James Douglas of British Columbia and former Prime Minister John A. Macdonald, however, there is no information on if Douglas or Macdonald were compensated. It appears that they had family members, either through blood or marriage, who were compensated for their slave ownership. Still, such high-profile positions speak to the potential influence of this compensation on Canada’s political landscape.
Want to join the Broadview community and make sure you don’t miss a story? Sign up for one of our newsletters.
It’s now clear that less than 30 years before Confederation, persons living in British North America, which later became part of Canada, were receiving compensation for the enslavement of Africans. What does this mean for Canada and its duty to apologize and offer reparations?
While it seems we, as a country, have apologized for many things, Canada has never apologized for its role in the enslavement of Africans. The narrative often adopted is that since there was no compensation here, it’s not about Canada. But enslavement occurred on these lands now called Canada. It was carried out by people who are considered loyal citizens of our land. The main reason to resist an apology is to deny our responsibility. The urgency of acknowledging and apologizing for these historical injustices cannot be overstated.
More on Broadview:
- Why descendants of Black settlers in Ontario fought to keep a controversial road name
- Meet the changemaker empowering British Columbia’s Black youth
- Are you Uber Eats? The mental toll of fine dining as a Black person in Ottawa
But an apology offers something more than sentimentalism. It provides a way to further the issue of justice. There are those who have suggested that we ignore slavery and move on. How can you? The institution of slavery has nurtured a particular way of looking at Black people. This perspective has negatively affected the lives of many Black Canadians up to today.
We can no longer argue that the chattel enslavement of Africans has nothing to do with Canada. Nor can we say its effect was negligible. If we are serious about building a future with hope, we must learn from history. Conveniently erasing parts of our past narrative is only to perpetuate the existing evils. We cannot ignore that it happened. We cannot forget that it negatively affected the lives of many, even though some have benefited from it.
Working towards a better future can only happen when we have all the facts. Canada is a good place. However, our pride must be bolstered by telling the truth about the past.
CORRECTION: A previous version of this story implied that Sir James Douglas and John A. Macdonald received compensation for owning slaves, when it is not clear if that is the case. This version has been corrected.
***
Rev. Paul Douglas Walfall is a minister at Pilgrim United in Edmonton.
Thanks for reading!
Did you know Broadview is the only media organization in Canada dedicated to covering progressive Christian news and views?
We are also a registered charity and rely on subscriptions and tax-deductible donations to keep our trustworthy, independent and award-winning journalism alive.
Please help us continue to share stories that open minds, inspire meaningful action and foster a world of compassion. Don’t wait. We can’t do it without you.
Here are some ways you can support us:
Thank you so very much for your generous support! Together, we can make a difference.
Jocelyn Bell, Editor/Publisher, CEO and Trisha Elliott, Executive Director
Comments
Sheldon LeGrow says:
Injustice has occurred throughout history. How far back do we go in history with our apologies. Those who were dealt with unjustly as well as the oppressors are gone. I did not commit (that I am aware of) any injustice to anyone. Blaming does no good. A problem has to be seen and rectified and the best way to do that is to acknowledge that bad things happened, as they have throughout history, and move forward with the knowledge of our mistakes. An apology, in my opinion, denotes responsibility which then opens the door to financial compensation. For me, we live in the "now" and nobody should be compensated for historical wrongs. I'm sure if I dug into my family background through the centuries I could find areas and instances where my ancestors were oppressed. But I cannot dwell on the past. I must look at who I am and what I can do today. If some find that offensive...so be it.
Gary says:
I wholeheartedly agree Sheldon, although some would be quick to say that it is easier to say as a privileged white man.
As I say to people who want to compensate for every wrong in the world. "You're feeding pigeons, and as long as you feed them, they come back for more."
The way we have to feel sorry for everyone, depresses me, It doesn't bolster my pride in this country it makes me ashamed that we have no backbone to say enough already.
The other issue is others saying "sorry" on my behalf. Enough said.