Some people see the Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB) as a load of government debt that will burden future generations. Manitoba Premier Brian Pallister has said the benefit pays people not to work, weakening our economy. My personal story of receiving the CERB, and my faith, compel me to think differently.
I was laid off in March, so my activities since then don’t count by traditional economic measures like gross domestic product (GDP). GDP basically measures how much money is being exchanged. It is often used as a primary indicator of economic and social well-being. The CERB has helped me explore how I can benefit society beyond paid work — endeavours that could be continued if a universal basic income program was implemented after the COVID-19 crisis.
Instead of job-hunting, I planned a day for my neighbours to connect over music at a safe distance. I am also training to volunteer with Storytelling Alberta, sharing stories with seniors over the phone.
Because my partner is still working, the CERB provides more than we need to pay the bills. We have increased our charitable giving to show gratitude for the financial support and care for our community.
With support coming in, I can maintain the savings I have, and go back to school this fall. I have been accepted to a program in therapeutic recreation, so I can help seniors stay happy, healthy and socially connected.
Another view on this topic: Universal basic income could leave some Canadians behind
I have a lot of privilege. Even having money saved up is not the norm. I’m grateful, and want to live generously. The CERB has allowed me to pursue that, and a future universal basic income would free me to do more things I find valuable, with less concern for how much I get paid.
A universal basic income, guaranteeing financial stability through monthly payments, would certainly change the way people work. But it would also change the way people volunteer and care for each other. Some might work part-time so they could be with their kids more. Others might spend an hour gardening instead of driving an hour to work. We could find richness in ways well beyond GDP (though improved financial stability might also boost GDP through increased consumer confidence).
The CERB also represents an opportunity for political engagement as churches. As followers of Jesus, we proclaim values like social justice, mutual support and simple living. The CERB shows how policies and spending programs can bring our values to life in the public sphere.
While some Christians are wary of state politics, we cannot let theological hang-ups stop us from actively supporting measures that could change so many lives. Political engagement is not the only way to live out our values, but it is important because of how many people, especially the most vulnerable, are impacted by government decisions.
We should be skeptical about the potential for governments, captive to the whims of voters and the lust for power, to act for justice. We should never confuse the Crown of Canada with the Kingdom of God. But we should encourage the best possible use of power for what good it can achieve.
I am grateful for the CERB and its positive impact in my life. Please remember my story is not only personal. It’s political. I am in this position largely because of a specific government policy. Policies matter, and as Christians we need to speak up for policies that promote social justice.
Christian theology says little about GDP. It says a lot about caring for each other. Let’s keep that in mind when we hear about governments paying people not to work.
Jonas Cornelsen lives in Calgary (Treaty 7). He attends Calgary Inter-Mennonite Church, and he also leads discussions as part of emerging ministries at Knox United Church.
I hope you enjoyed reading this article from Broadview. The magazine and its forerunners have been publishing continuously since 1829. We face a crisis today like no other in our 191-year history and we need your help. Would you consider a one-time gift to see us through this emergency?
We’re working hard to keep producing the print and digital versions of Broadview. We’ve adjusted our editorial plans to focus on coverage of the social, ethical and spiritual elements of the pandemic. But we can only deliver Broadview’s award-winning journalism if we can pay our bills. A single tax-receiptable gift right now is literally a lifeline.
Things will get better — we’ve overcome adversity before. But until then, we really need your help. No matter how large or small, I’m extremely grateful for your support.
"As followers of Jesus, we proclaim values like social justice, mutual support and simple living." I don't know what Jesus you follow, but He is certainly a different Jesus that I emulate.
I have worked hard to be in the financial position I'm now in. I pay taxes to fund those CERB cheques, so enjoy. (BTW - CERB is to offset the cost of living, you seem to present it as "free money". Nothing is free, not even the faith you profess.)
Jim Kells says:
Wow! Quite an interesting perspective that Mr. Cornelson has about universal basic income (UBI). Personally, I have been intrigued about the UBI concept, but it differs considerably from the notion presented in the article. To me, and I am admittedly at the novice stage of my thinking, UBI would obviate the need for a myriad of social programs that are in place now and take an enormous amount of resources to administer. So, at least in part, I see some cost offset by adopting UBI and eliminating social support programs. De facto, UBI is a broad-based social support system. Everyone would get it, and those of us who are working, provided that we have an income beyond a reasonable threshold, would have it clawed back. Just like OAS for those over age 65 with a sufficiently high income. For me, I would hope to always have my UBI benefit clawed back. Indeed, if the benefit were set at the right level, that would be true for most folks. What Mr. Cornelson seems to miss or not understand is that the government is us, and those of us working must pay for UBI to work! As another respondent said, there is no free lunch!
Mike DAmours says:
The government's response to the pandemic and helping the most vulnerable has been confusing. There were tidbits of policy gradually shared on TV by Trudeau, but many groups have been ignored. People with disabilities in receipt of the ODSP received a paltry $100 in addition to their $1,169 income. Myself, I receive the ODSP, and I think it's not much. It's nearly impossible to have an apartment nowadays on that income, because most one-bedroom apartments cost at least $1,000. I know some recipients choose to live in a rooming house, but myself, I have a bachelor. The system needs to change, whether it's basic income or not, new policies need to adapt to the reality of today. In my opinion, you need at least $2,000 to stay afloat. Under $2,000, you struggle a lot. But I'm glad you've got the CERB, it does help. I applied for the CERB but I returned the entire amount. Senator Segal has an interesting point of view on poverty issues and what we could do to offset these issues in society.
WALTER QUIRING says:
good to see and read from you , Jonas.
WALTER QUIRING says:
Joas, You are away ahead of us, both intellectually and insightful. Please tell us more.