The Jesuits have a habit of beginning the particular. Their method of moral reasoning, casuistry, doesn’t leap to sweeping rules. Instead, it starts with messy cases, real people, the tangled minutia of life. On his podcast, Revisionist History, Malcolm Gladwell fell in love with that tradition “of setting aside principles and engaging in the specifics of the case in question.”
That kind of specificity may sound like an odd fit for the man who gave us broad, big-idea books like The Tipping Point and Outliers. But in another way, it’s the most natural move in the world. Gladwell, now 62, began his career as a business and science reporter, trained to notice detail and trace the story hidden in the evidence. From there he became one of the most influential non-fiction writers alive, shaping how millions of people think about success, risk and change. And in Revisionist History, the podcast he launched in 2016, he has found a new pulpit. From exploring “the forgotten and misunderstood” about Elvis and Freudian slips, Second World War fighter bombers and the idea of pulling the goalie much earlier than any self-respecting coach would ever contemplate doing, Gladwell looks at things in a different way. Again and again, he circles back to themes of compassion, conscience and the communities that try and fail to live them out.
You may unsubscribe from any of our newsletters at any time.
If you listen closely, a kind of gospel emerges. One line in particular anchors it: “Sin is the failure to bother to care,” Gladwell says in an episode about gun violence, riffing on a quote from Catholic theologian James F. Keenan, who described sin as a failure to bother to love. It’s a definition both bracing and merciful. Bracing, because it holds us accountable, not only for what we do, but for what we neglect. Merciful, because it redirects focus from shame and punishment to responsibility and concern.
Gladwell’s attention to faith is a homecoming of sorts. Born in England, he grew up in Mennonite country in Elmira, Ont., after his family moved to Canada in 1969. His father, an English mathematician, and his mother, a family therapist from Jamaica, were churchgoing Presbyterians but eventually joined a Mennonite congregation.
Gladwell has said he drifted away from religion in adulthood but was drawn back into the fold while researching his 2013 book, David and Goliath, about underdogs who beat the odds. “I was so incredibly struck in writing these stories by the incredible power faith had in people’s lives,” he told Religion News Service in an interview. “I am in the process of rediscovering my own faith again.”
More on Broadview:
- Why bisexual Christians still feel unseen in affirming congregations
- I grew up in an evangelical church. Now I‘m a 2LGBTQ+ affirming minister
- Is Gen Z really coming back to church?
I come to Gladwell’s work with a similar small-town Ontario background. I’m the son of a Presbyterian minister, raised in Bradford, where faith meant neighbours showing up, week in and week out. Gladwell’s podcast often feels like a conversation partner for me now; I listen to him on long walks or drives, his voice probing the same questions that shaped my own upbringing.
One of Gladwell’s most moving episodes is “Generous Orthodoxy,” which tells the story of Chester Wenger, a Mennonite minister in Pennsylvania who blessed his gay son’s wedding. For this act of compassion, Wenger’s church stripped him of his ministry. Gladwell’s narration captures the cost: “He gave his life to a church that said, ‘We’re all in this together,’ and now that church has split his family in two.”
But Wenger never gave up his faith. At 96, he penned a letter to the church, asking, “What would Jesus do with our sons and daughters who are bullied, homeless, sexually abused, and driven to suicide?” Gladwell calls the answer to that question “generous orthodoxy,” citing American theologian Hans Frei’s concept of valuing tradition but being open to change. “Orthodoxy without generosity leads to blindness… and generosity without orthodoxy is shallow and empty,” Gladwell explains. Wenger’s life shows the difficulty — and beauty — of holding both together.
Gladwell’s admiration for the Jesuits runs through a trilogy of episodes. He introduces listeners to their teaching on “disordered attachments,” the prejudices, fears and biases that skew judgment and have to be set aside to look at problems with fresh eyes.
He shows how the Jesuit approach echoes in the life of John Rock, the devout Catholic doctor who helped create the birth control pill. Rock attended mass daily and believed the pill could align with Catholic teaching. Rome disagreed. Reflecting back, Rock recalled advice from a priest in his youth: “John, always stick to your own conscience. Let no one ever keep it for you.…And when I say no one, I mean no one.”
The episode frames Rock’s dilemma as another exercise in generous orthodoxy: faithfulness to church and faithfulness to conscience in painful tension.
Gladwell’s own attempts to weigh competing values have at times provoked controversy. Last September, for example, he admitted he hid his true opinion on allowing transgender athletes to compete in women’s sports, claiming he felt “cowed” into tacit support. “It’s irresolvable,” he later reflected as a guest on comedian Trevor Noah’s podcast. “If you’re going to pick one side, you have to accommodate the other.”
The episodes closest to Gladwell’s heart return to his family’s roots. In “I Was a Stranger and You Welcomed Me,” he recounts how his parents’ small Ontario church sponsored Vietnamese refugees in 1979. His immigrant mother, Joyce, put it simply: “I was a stranger, and I had to be taken in myself.” She felt a pull to take care of the newcomers; to do otherwise would be a sin.
Taken together, these episodes form what I’d call the Gospel According to Malcolm Gladwell. Not a gospel of doctrine, but of stories. Not a list of rules, but a reminder to care.
Gladwell’s own path has carried him far from small-town Ontario. He is a global author, a public intellectual, a master of narrative. Yet through Revisionist History he returns, again and again, to the same questions that shaped him in his youth: How do we hold truth and mercy together? How do we welcome the stranger? How do we “go and do likewise,” as Jesus commanded?
Gladwell doesn’t give answers. He gives stories: stories that make us look harder, care more and be generous in how we approach the dilemmas of real people. Sin, Gladwell tells us, is the failure to take care. Faith, his stories suggest, is what happens when we do. That is his gospel.
***
Jonathan Scott is a writer in Bradford, Ont.
This article first appeared in Broadview’s May/June 2026 issue with the title “The Gospel According to Malcom Gladwell.”


