Decorative Picture
(Photo courtesy of Pixabay/Creative Commons.)

Topics: Spirituality | Opinion

U.S. atheists prefer cats, Christians love dogs: study

Being a more regular church attendee also correlated with another interesting detail about pet ownership


(RNS) — I do not, and will not ever, own a cat.

Instead, I own a dog. In fact, as I type this, Lucy, my 3-kilogram Yorkshire terrier, is snoring next to me on my office chair.

Why do I prefer dogs to cats?

It could be because — along with being a social scientist — I am an American Baptist pastor. And like many other Christians in the United States, I’m more likely to own a dog than a cat.

My friends who skip church, however, prefer cats.

At least that’s what the data indicates.

“Religious Traditions and Pet Ownership.” (Graphic by Ryan Burge)

In a new article published in the Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, Samuel Perry and I took advantage of several new questions added to the General Social Survey about pet ownership to look at the relationship between religion and man’s best friends.

First, some general results from the data.

Among Americans who said they own a pet, nearly three-quarters (74.9 percent) said they had a dog in 2018. Fewer than half (40.3 percent) identified as cat owners. The average American pet-owning household has 1.72 animals (which also included reptiles, fish, pigs, goats, birds, horses and small mammals).

Evangelicals, mainline Protestants, the religiously unaffiliated and members of what the GSS calls “other faiths” — religious people who are not Christian or Jewish — have the most pets, at nearly two per family.

Catholic households, on average, have one and a half pets, while Jews (.95 pets) and black Protestants (.72 pets) average just under one pet each.

“Religious Traditions and Number of Pets.” (Graphic by Ryan Burge)

What about type of animal owned by religious tradition?

Dogs are the most popular household pet. In fact, there’s no religious traditi­on in which fewer than half of adherents own a dog.

However, there are some interesting differences among faith groups. Evangelicals and Catholics are more likely to have dogs than are mainline Christians. Mainliners are more likely than evangelicals and black Protestants to own cats. Jews prefer dogs to cats. Jewish families are also more likely than other traditions to own a small mammal or a bird.

Those who claim no religious identity are most likely to have a cat.

More on Broadview: How many U.S. Christians believe Trump is anointed by God?

We also found one other interesting piece of data.

For our study, we put together a regression model that predicted how many pets were owned at each level of church attendance while controlling for a number of factors that could impact pet ownership, such as income, geography, gender, race and education.

While not conclusive, it appears that the more someone goes to church or other religious worship service, the less likely they are to own a pet.

Why is this the case?

“The Interaction Between Church Attendance and Number of Pets.” (Graphic: Ryan Burge)

We suggest two possible reasons.

One is practical. People who are highly involved in activities at church or other houses of worship may not have the time to take care of a lot of animals in their home.

A second possibility is that people may be using pets as a replacement for social interaction. Therefore, people who are frequently attending church events don’t need to fill that social void with pets.

In another regression model, we found that higher church attendance is especially predictive of lower cat ownership.

A wealth of social science has found that cat owners are more likely to express feelings of being socially isolated. It seems possible that the same factors that drive people to be religiously unaffiliated may also make them more likely to own a cat. Or, said more succinctly: Controlling for other factors, cats are the preferred pet among those who never go to church.

(Photo by StockSnap/Pixabay/Creative Commons.)

While this is not the most groundbreaking research published in recent memory, we do think that it speaks to something more significant happening in American culture.

As Robert Putnam famously concluded in his 2000 book, Bowling Alone, we are more socially atomized now than ever before. While fraternal organizations, bowling leagues and church used to fill that social void decades ago, Americans have now turned to other methods of not feeling alone.

While social media sites have provided some facade of social interaction, many of us have discovered that pets fill that void nicely.

It’s hard not to smile when you come home from work and your dog — or your cat — is happy to see you, no matter what you believe.

(Ryan Burge is an assistant professor of political science at Eastern Illinois University and can be reached at @ryanburge. The views expressed in this commentary do not necessarily reflect those of Religion News Service.)


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

  • says:

    Cat owners are more likely to express feelings of social isolation? What about this: Cats are independent, difficult to train and prefer to do their own thing. Dogs, however, are easily trained and can be taught to obey.
    Religion teaches people to follow the crowd no matter how illogical things are. Atheism allows people to think critically and do their own thing.
    I have had cats and I've had a few dogs. If I were to have another pet it would be a cat and the cat would be independent as I have chosen to be. Usually the crowd is going in the wrong direction.

  • says:

    So it’s not an accident that dog spelled backwards is “god."