Left photo: A crowd of people with flags and signs celebrate; right photo: A group of children stand, one child holding a flag
Left: People rejoice as hostage handover begins between Israel and Hamas on Oct. 13, 2025, in Tel Aviv. Right: Palestinians gather following the announcement that Israel and Hamas have agreed to a Gaza ceasefire deal in front of the headquarters of the Egyptian committee in Deir al-Balah, central Gaza Strip, on Oct. 9, 2025. (Photos © Kyodonews via ZUMA Press via CP; © Rizek Abdeljawad/Xinhua via ZUMA Press via CP)

Why I can’t celebrate the Israel-Hamas peace deal — yet

Any path forward cannot work without a foundation of justice, writes Jeffrey J. Wilkinson
Oct. 17, 2025

The events of the past few weeks have left many unsure of how to process everything. First came Canada’s recognition (along with at least nine other countries) of a Palestinian state. Then, the anticipation and signing of the first phase of the Donald Trump-led ceasefire/peace plan, followed by the release of surviving Israeli hostages, Palestinian prisoners and detainees, and the cessation of bombing in Gaza.

These events have brought both relief and an abiding sense that the underlying causes of the struggle remain unaddressed. While the recognition of a Palestinian state was met with contempt by some, celebrations by others and a muted response by many, the “peace plan” has been widely celebrated in the media and by the vast majority of Canadians. It is important, though, to look beneath the surface to understand its ramifications and reflect on what it does and doesn’t do.


The best of Broadview straight to your inbox.

This field is hidden when viewing the form
Which newsletters are you interested in receiving?
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.


You may unsubscribe from any of our newsletters at any time.

While it is impossible to overstate how immense the repercussions of Oct. 7, 2023 have been for the Jewish community, both Oct. 7 and the hostages’ release should be seen as part of a much larger story. The Palestinian experience of loss and repression really began in 1948 and the Nakba (catastrophe in Arabic, referring to the destruction of Palestinian society resulting from the war that led to Israel’s founding as a state) continues to this day.

To understand the disconnect between how most Jews experienced Oct. 7, all that happened since, and the way Palestinians have processed these events, we need to understand how the expression of one story was used to silence another.

A common characterization of Oct. 7 is that it was the greatest attack on Jews since the Holocaust. To Palestinians, Oct. 7 was an attack against Israel’s military occupation, rather than an attack on a group solely due to their identity. The Jewish reaction is about vulnerability, intergenerational trauma and a painful reminder of the permanence of Jewish precarity, feelings that were exacerbated by the palpable rise in incidents of antisemitism in Canada and many parts of the world. Similarly, Palestinian responses to the horrors of Gaza rest in a long line of oppression, loss and trauma going back to 1948. This pain was then intensified by the many attempts to silence Palestinian voices rising in defence of the innocents of Gaza, framing them as supporters of terror.

Any relief I have experienced in recent days is tempered by my moral and ethical commitments as a Jew and as a human to expect something more than a return to the status quo that existed on Oct. 6, 2023. The desperate realities that predate Oct. 7 have become much worse — Gaza in ruins, with over 68,000 dead and 180,000 injured. As someone who talks to dozens of Palestinians regularly, I share their reality that this “peace plan” does not address any of the deeply ingrained policies of degradation, restrictions of movement, theft of land, denials of liberty and the rejection of Palestinian self-determination.


More on Broadview:


Holding Israel to account for its own war crimes in Gaza is a necessary step to set the groundwork for a new way forward. If we view Palestinians as less worthy of protection and safety than us, we abdicate our moral responsibility.

Statements from many western leaders about the need to rekindle the two-state solution cannot be taken seriously when Israel’s leaders have been clear that they stand firmly against it and have allowed de-facto annexation to take place through the continued growth of settlements on Palestinian lands.

Much of the discourse in recent days seems to revolve around the degree of credit Trump deserves for accomplishing the return of the hostages and an end of the war in Gaza. But can this peace plan work without a foundation of justice?

The 20-point plan that was signed on Oct. 13 in Egypt celebrates conclusions — that this will lead to lasting peace in the region — that are far from certain. Even if all the points are implemented, the underlying issue — a 58-year occupation — remains unaddressed. Perhaps worse still, Palestinians are returning to a Gaza of rubble, death and hopelessness. A place with virtually no schools, hospitals and infrastructure. Add to this the many difficulties expected ahead in the implementation of the plan itself, including how much of Gaza Israel will continue to occupy, the creation of a transitional government and the deployment of an international “stabilization force.”

While these details are important, they are not the heart of the matter. This plan was created primarily by the United States, tailored to what Israel could live with. This leaves those of us who, like Martin Luther King, Jr., believe that “true peace is not merely the absence of tension, it is the presence of justice,” distrustful, unsettled and even hopeless for a true lasting peace, one where both Israelis and Palestinians have the right to self-determination, and equal rights for all the people of the land.

I am acutely aware of how difficult it is to look beyond the headlines and pictures that pull on our emotions and see what is missing. National media coverage in Canada has focused mostly on the release of the hostages and the ceasefire. Feeling relief at these events is entirely natural, yet if justice is our guiding light, these accomplishments, which bring needed relief, leave in place a system of injustice that continues to be tolerated by our political leaders.

This is a moment to call for something different — a justice-centred approach. Looking starkly at reality is neither a Jewish nor a Palestinian position, but one based on universal human rights and intellectual honesty.

***

Jeffrey J. Wilkinson is an educator, researcher, facilitator and a co-author, with Raja Khouri, of The Wall Between: What Jews and Palestinians Don’t Want to Know about Each Other.

2 Comments Leave a Reply

  1. Congrats on writing a piece that calls for accountability of Israel (needed) but not of Hamas (also needed). Nice job (sarcasm).

  2. I have read the Hamas charter. I am keeping up with the happenings between Israel and those who want to see Israel eliminated. Hamas is part of the Muslim Brotherhood. It is pledged to eliminate Israel. There is no desire to live in peace with Israel. What Hamas did on October 7 was not war it was gleeful torture of innocent people. Many in the west, for some obscure reason believe the Hamas propaganda which actually began the day after the massacre. There can only be peace when Hamas and its ilk have been totally and absolutely eliminated and young Palestinian children must be raised in an atmosphere of love and understanding without the millstone of religion hanging round their necks. And this, I fear, will never happen.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

our latest issue

latest cover September/October 2025
In this issue:
A new look at the sun, a 4.6-billion-year-old star; How Qualicum First Nation awakened its language; Is prison labour rehabilitation or exploitation?